Smeal Aerial Fire Apparatus problems by model year
Updated from NHTSA data · How we count
NHTSA has 0 owner complaints and 5 recalls on file for the Smeal Aerial Fire Apparatus (2016–2019).
- Complaints
- 0
- Recalls
- 5
- Model years
- 4
- Worst year
- —
Complaints by model year
Newer model years have had less time on the road, so they naturally have fewer complaints. Compare a year against its neighbors rather than against brand-new models.
Every Smeal Aerial Fire Apparatus model year
| Year | Complaints | Crashes | Fires | Injuries | Recalls | Top problem |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Aerial Fire Apparatus | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 2018 Aerial Fire Apparatus | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 2017 Aerial Fire Apparatus | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| 2016 Aerial Fire Apparatus | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | — |
Smeal Aerial Fire Apparatus recalls
Risk: The aerial device may collapse increasing the risk of injury.
Risk: The hydraulic fluid leak may result in inadvertent movement of the aerial device, increasing the risk of injury.
Risk: A guardrail that bends or breaks under load can increase the risk of injury.
Risk: The unintended turning on or off of accessories such as emergency beacons or automatic snow chains can increase the risk of a crash.
Risk: If the power output cannot be changed, once the fire truck arrives at the scene, it may not be able to pump water to aid in extinguishing the fire, increasing the risk of injury.
Other Smeal models
Source: U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Office of Defects Investigation public data. Complaints are submitted by owners and are not verified by NHTSA or by us; a complaint does not prove a defect exists. Methodology