Chrysler 200 problems by model year
Updated from NHTSA data · How we count
NHTSA has 1,012 owner complaints and 16 recalls on file for the Chrysler 200 (2011–2017). The 2015 200 has the most serious complaints, most often about electrical system.
- Complaints
- 1,012
- Recalls
- 16
- Model years
- 7
- Worst year
- 2015
Complaints by model year
Newer model years have had less time on the road, so they naturally have fewer complaints. Compare a year against its neighbors rather than against brand-new models.
Worst Chrysler 200 years to buy
Ranked by our severity-weighted complaint score (crashes, fires and injuries count extra — how it works).
- 2015 Chrysler 200 — 493 complaints, 17 crashes, 6 fires; top problem: Electrical System
- 2013 Chrysler 200 — 176 complaints, 4 crashes, 1 fire; top problem: Engine
- 2016 Chrysler 200 — 122 complaints, 7 crashes, 3 fires; top problem: Engine
- 2012 Chrysler 200 — 102 complaints, 2 crashes, 1 fire; top problem: Engine
- 2011 Chrysler 200 — 55 complaints, 4 crashes, 1 fire; top problem: Engine
Fewest serious complaints among years at least 3 years old: 2017 (21 complaints).
Every Chrysler 200 model year
| Year | Complaints | Crashes | Fires | Injuries | Recalls | Top problem |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 200 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Engine |
| 2016 200 | 122 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 2 | Engine |
| 2015 200 | 493 | 17 | 6 | 14 | 8 | Electrical System |
| 2014 200 | 43 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | Engine |
| 2013 200 | 176 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 5 | Engine |
| 2012 200 | 102 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 4 | Engine |
| 2011 200 | 55 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | Engine |
Most common Chrysler 200 problem areas (all years)
- Engine377 complaints
- Electrical System351 complaints
- Transmission & Drivetrain229 complaints
- Airbags183 complaints
- Seats & Seat Belts88 complaints
- Fuel, Hybrid & EV Propulsion66 complaints
- Brakes60 complaints
- Driver Assistance & Safety Tech49 complaints
- Steering47 complaints
- Acceleration & Cruise Control45 complaints
Complaint trend
Chrysler 200 recalls
Risk: If the vehicle maintains its speed or accelerates despite attempts to deactivate the cruise control, there would be an increased risk of a crash.
Risk: If the active headrests do not deploy in certain rear-end crashes, the front seat occupants have an increased risk of injury.
Risk: If the frontal air bags, seat belt pretensioners, and side air bags are disabled, there is an increased risk of injury to the vehicle occupants in the event of a vehicle crash that necessitates deployment of these safety systems.
Risk: If the chassis fastener joints are improperly torqued they may loosen and fail or fall out, reducing steering and handling capability and increasing the risk of a crash.
Risk: If the vehicle unexpectedly shifts to neutral, there is an increased risk of a crash.
Risk: If both pieces were not replaced together, the occupant detection and classification system may not be properly calibrated and the passenger air bag may improperly deploy in the event of a crash, increasing the risk of injury.
Risk: An intermittent loss of power to electrical components could cause a vehicle to stall without warning, increasing the risk of a crash.
Risk: Exploitation of the software vulnerability may result in unauthorized remote modification and control of certain vehicle systems, increasing the risk of a crash.
Risk: If the shift indicator displays "Park" but the park lock does not engage, the vehicle may roll away increasing the risk of a crash.
Risk: Excessive heat and melting wiring insulation may result in an electrical short, increasing the risk of a fire.
Risk: Damage to the tire or reduced braking increases the risk of a vehicle crash.
Risk: If the engine stalls while driving it may increase the risk of a crash.
Risk: In the event of a crash necessitating the deployment of the active head restraints , their non-deployment could increase the risk of injury.
Risk: A broken control valve in the fuel tank assembly may lead to an engine stall or fuel leakage. An engine stall while driving may contribute to a vehicle crash. Fuel leakage, in the presence of an ignition source, may result in a fire.
Risk: Connecting rod failure may lead to engine seizure which may increase the risk of a crash.
Risk: A missing or incorrectly installed rivet could compromise the ability of the steering column to support the occupant loads in the event of a frontal crash, decreasing the effectiveness of the frontal impact safety system. As a result, the condition may increase the potential for injury in a frontal crash.
Other Chrysler models
Source: U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Office of Defects Investigation public data. Complaints are submitted by owners and are not verified by NHTSA or by us; a complaint does not prove a defect exists. Methodology