Terex Aerial Devices problems by model year
Updated from NHTSA data · How we count
NHTSA has 0 owner complaints and 16 recalls on file for the Terex Aerial Devices (2005–2017).
- Complaints
- 0
- Recalls
- 16
- Model years
- 13
- Worst year
- —
Complaints by model year
Newer model years have had less time on the road, so they naturally have fewer complaints. Compare a year against its neighbors rather than against brand-new models.
Every Terex Aerial Devices model year
| Year | Complaints | Crashes | Fires | Injuries | Recalls | Top problem |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Aerial Devices | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 2016 Aerial Devices | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | — |
| 2015 Aerial Devices | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | — |
| 2014 Aerial Devices | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | — |
| 2013 Aerial Devices | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | — |
| 2012 Aerial Devices | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | — |
| 2011 Aerial Devices | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | — |
| 2010 Aerial Devices | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | — |
| 2009 Aerial Devices | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | — |
| 2008 Aerial Devices | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | — |
| 2007 Aerial Devices | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | — |
| 2006 Aerial Devices | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| 2005 Aerial Devices | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
Terex Aerial Devices recalls
Risk: A cable step that fails during use increases the risk of injury.
Risk: If the hood switch prevents the remote engine controls from shutting the vehicle engine down in the event of a hydraulic issue on the Aerial or Digger Derrick, it may increase the risk of an injury.
Risk: Without proper protection against electrical shock, the user has a greater risk of injury.
Risk: If the platform tilts unexpectedly, the user may fall, increasing their risk of injury.
Risk: Cracks, if not repaired, may result in the failure of the aerial pedestal, increasing the risk of injury to the operator or those nearby.
Risk: Repeated contact may result in the rod eyes cracking. This cracking can lead to the failure of the boom tip leveling cylinder rod eye and the platform tilting unexpectedly which could cause the occupants to fall from the aerial platform, increasing their risk of injury.
Risk: If the leveling system fails, the aerial platform may tilt, increasing the risk of injury to the user or those nearby.
Risk: Outrigger drifting could result in the platform falling and seriously injuring platform occupants or bystanders.
Risk: If the attaching bolts fail, the boom may fall, increasing the risk of injury to the operator or those nearby.
Risk: A crack in the frame may cause frame failure, resulting in a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.
Risk: Damaged seals may allow the outrigger to drift. If the outrigger cylinder drifts, stability may be affected and the unit may overturn, increasing the risk of injury.
Risk: Fatigue cracks may cause the leveling arm to fail. If the arm fails while the aerial device is in use, the platform may move unexpectedly, increasing the risk of injury to the operator or those nearby.
Risk: Unexpected movement of the Aerial Device while in use may lead to personal injury.
Risk: If the GFI does not function, and a tool that is plugged into the inverter has a short, the operator could receive an electrical shock, resulting in electrocution.
Risk: If the leveling arm fails, the platform could tilt and the occupants may fall from the platform.
Risk: Failure of the lanyard anchor could occur increasing the risk of personal injuries or death.
Other Terex models
Source: U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Office of Defects Investigation public data. Complaints are submitted by owners and are not verified by NHTSA or by us; a complaint does not prove a defect exists. Methodology