Mercedes-Benz CLA250 problems by model year
Updated from NHTSA data · How we count
NHTSA has 174 owner complaints and 15 recalls on file for the Mercedes-Benz CLA250 (2012–2017). The 2014 CLA250 has the most serious complaints, most often about engine.
- Complaints
- 174
- Recalls
- 15
- Model years
- 6
- Worst year
- 2014
Complaints by model year
Newer model years have had less time on the road, so they naturally have fewer complaints. Compare a year against its neighbors rather than against brand-new models.
Worst Mercedes-Benz CLA250 years to buy
Ranked by our severity-weighted complaint score (crashes, fires and injuries count extra — how it works).
- 2014 Mercedes-Benz CLA250 — 60 complaints, 4 crashes, 3 fires; top problem: Engine
- 2016 Mercedes-Benz CLA250 — 45 complaints, 2 crashes, 1 fire; top problem: Engine
- 2015 Mercedes-Benz CLA250 — 43 complaints, 2 crashes; top problem: Engine
- 2017 Mercedes-Benz CLA250 — 15 complaints, 2 crashes; top problem: Electrical System
Fewest serious complaints among years at least 3 years old: 2012 (4 complaints).
Every Mercedes-Benz CLA250 model year
| Year | Complaints | Crashes | Fires | Injuries | Recalls | Top problem |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 CLA250 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 10 | Electrical System |
| 2016 CLA250 | 45 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | Engine |
| 2015 CLA250 | 43 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | Engine |
| 2014 CLA250 | 60 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 | Engine |
| 2013 CLA250 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Airbags |
| 2012 CLA250 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Engine |
Most common Mercedes-Benz CLA250 problem areas (all years)
- Engine49 complaints
- Electrical System29 complaints
- Body & Structure25 complaints
- Airbags24 complaints
- Transmission & Drivetrain16 complaints
- Fuel, Hybrid & EV Propulsion14 complaints
- Visibility & Wipers9 complaints
- Steering7 complaints
- Driver Assistance & Safety Tech6 complaints
- Brakes6 complaints
Complaint trend
Mercedes-Benz CLA250 recalls
Risk: A detached roof panel can become a road hazard, increasing the risk of a crash.
Risk: A disabled eCall system would prevent a vehicle occupant from contacting the emergency services call center in an emergency, potentially delaying emergency responders and increasing the risk of injury.
Risk: A separated universal joint bearing can cause a loss of steering control and increase the risk of a crash.
Risk: The adhesive bonding of the front panel might deteriorate, possibly causing the front panel to detach from the vehicle and become a road hazard, increasing the risk of a crash.
Risk: A disabled eCall system would prevent a vehicle occupant from contacting emergency services through the call center in an emergency, potentially delaying emergency responders and increasing the risk of injury.
Risk: Failure of the eCall system may result in emergency responders being dispatched to the wrong location, increasing the risk of injury following a crash.
Risk: In the event of a crash, if the air bag does not deploy as designed, the front seat passenger has an increased risk of an injury.
Risk: An inaccurate vehicle location may delay emergency responders, increasing the risk of injury.
Risk: If the driver air bag inadvertently deploys, it can increase the risk of injury and a crash.
Risk: If the air bags do not deploy as intended in the event of a crash, there would be an increased risk of injury in the event of a crash.
Risk: If the starting current limiter overheats, the surrounding components can melt, increasing the risk of a fire.
Risk: If the pelvis airbag or the front passenger airbag does not deploy as intended in the event of a crash, the occupants have an increased risk of injury.
Risk: If the vehicles unexpectedly need increased pressure on the brake pedal to apply the brakes, there would be an increased risk of a crash.
Risk: Engine damage may result in a stall, increasing the risk of a crash.
Risk: If the fuses were not properly installed, they may lose electrical contact. In the event of a loss of electrical contact, certain systems may be impacted, including the function of the front passenger seat occupancy recognition system, the passenger side air bag indicator lamp, the instrument cluster and the windshield wipers. Should the function of the front passenger seat occupancy recognition system or the passenger side airbag indicator lamp be affected, the risk of injury for passengers in the event of a crash would be increased. Should the function of the instrument cluster and the windshield wipers be affected, the risk of a crash would be increased.
Other Mercedes-Benz models
- Mercedes-Benz C3001,289 complaints
- Mercedes-Benz E350769 complaints
- Mercedes-Benz C 300431 complaints
- Mercedes-Benz GLC 300404 complaints
- Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 2500345 complaints
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 250243 complaints
- Mercedes-Benz GLE 350229 complaints
- Mercedes-Benz ML350226 complaints
- Mercedes-Benz GLK350217 complaints
- Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 3500217 complaints
Source: U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Office of Defects Investigation public data. Complaints are submitted by owners and are not verified by NHTSA or by us; a complaint does not prove a defect exists. Methodology