Glaval Bus Universal problems by model year
Updated from NHTSA data · How we count
NHTSA has 0 owner complaints and 15 recalls on file for the Glaval Bus Universal (2006–2024).
- Complaints
- 0
- Recalls
- 15
- Model years
- 19
- Worst year
- —
Complaints by model year
Newer model years have had less time on the road, so they naturally have fewer complaints. Compare a year against its neighbors rather than against brand-new models.
Every Glaval Bus Universal model year
| Year | Complaints | Crashes | Fires | Injuries | Recalls | Top problem |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Universal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | — |
| 2023 Universal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| 2022 Universal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| 2021 Universal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| 2020 Universal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 2019 Universal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | — |
| 2018 Universal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | — |
| 2017 Universal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | — |
| 2016 Universal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | — |
| 2015 Universal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | — |
| 2014 Universal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | — |
| 2013 Universal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | — |
| 2012 Universal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | — |
| 2011 Universal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| 2010 Universal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 2009 Universal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 2008 Universal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 2007 Universal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 2006 Universal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
Glaval Bus Universal recalls
Risk: An incorrect ground connection increases the risk of a fire.
Risk: The seat back could release under the shoulder belt load, increasing the risk of injury during a crash.
Risk: Damaged brake lines can cause loss of brake pressure, increasing the risk of a crash.
Risk: A PRC module failure can increase the risk of a fire.
Risk: If the roof hatch external handle breaks, in the event of an emergency, the hatch cannot be easily opened from outside the vehicle, increasing the risk of injury.
Risk: If the bolts loosen, the seat belt assembly may fail to restrain the occupant in the event of a crash, increasing their risk of injury.
Risk: In the event of an emergency necessitating escape from the vehicle, the lack of egress windows may trap occupants inside, increasing their risk of injury.
Risk: If the wheelchair lift platform stops above the vehicle floor, the wheelchair user can tip inwards toward the vehicle when exiting the lift, increasing their risk of injury.
Risk: If the seat belt end does not remain secured to the vehicle, the occupant will not be restrained in the event of a crash, increasing their risk of injury.
Risk: If the seat belt end does not remain secured to the vehicle, the occupant will not be restrained in the event of a crash, increasing their risk of injury.
Risk: If the seat is loose at the base there would be an increased risk of injury in the event of a sudden stop or crash.
Risk: If the platform side plates crack or the platform mounting fails from out-of-position bearings, the lift platform can separate from the lift and come to rest against the vehicle's lift door. When the vehicle's doors are opened, the platform may fall onto the lift operator, increasing their risk of injury.
Risk: In the event of a crash, the seat can separate from the base frame, increasing the risk of injury to the seat occupant.
Risk: If the bearings move out of position, the stowed platform may have excessive movement resulting in failure of the platform mounting. This failure could cause the wheel chair lift platform to fall out of the vehicle when the doors are opened, increasing the risk of injury for the lift operator.
Risk: A loose tie rod jam nut may result in a loss of control, increasing the risk of a crash.
Other Glaval Bus models
Source: U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Office of Defects Investigation public data. Complaints are submitted by owners and are not verified by NHTSA or by us; a complaint does not prove a defect exists. Methodology