Ford C-Max problems by model year
Updated from NHTSA data · How we count
NHTSA has 218 owner complaints and 12 recalls on file for the Ford C-Max (2013–2018). The 2015 C-Max has the most serious complaints, most often about driver assistance & safety tech.
- Complaints
- 218
- Recalls
- 12
- Model years
- 6
- Worst year
- 2015
Complaints by model year
Newer model years have had less time on the road, so they naturally have fewer complaints. Compare a year against its neighbors rather than against brand-new models.
Worst Ford C-Max years to buy
Ranked by our severity-weighted complaint score (crashes, fires and injuries count extra — how it works).
- 2015 Ford C-Max — 42 complaints, 8 crashes; top problem: Driver Assistance & Safety Tech
- 2013 Ford C-Max — 92 complaints, 1 fire; top problem: Electrical System
- 2014 Ford C-Max — 50 complaints, 3 crashes, 1 fire; top problem: Electrical System
Fewest serious complaints among years at least 3 years old: 2017 (13 complaints).
Every Ford C-Max model year
| Year | Complaints | Crashes | Fires | Injuries | Recalls | Top problem |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 C-Max | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Airbags |
| 2017 C-Max | 13 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | Acceleration & Cruise Control |
| 2016 C-Max | 13 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Driver Assistance & Safety Tech |
| 2015 C-Max | 42 | 8 | 0 | 7 | 6 | Driver Assistance & Safety Tech |
| 2014 C-Max | 50 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 8 | Electrical System |
| 2013 C-Max | 92 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | Electrical System |
Most common Ford C-Max problem areas (all years)
- Electrical System45 complaints
- Transmission & Drivetrain38 complaints
- Steering36 complaints
- Driver Assistance & Safety Tech18 complaints
- Body & Structure16 complaints
- Engine15 complaints
- Acceleration & Cruise Control11 complaints
- Airbags10 complaints
- Wheels & Tires9 complaints
- Fuel, Hybrid & EV Propulsion6 complaints
Complaint trend
Ford C-Max recalls
Risk: A rearview camera that fails to properly display an image can reduce the driver’s view behind the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.
Risk: A damaged or missing bushing may prevent the vehicle from shifting into the intended gear, and cause the vehicle to move in an unexpected direction. Additionally, the vehicle may roll after the driver selects the 'Park' position. Either scenario increases the risk of a crash or injury.
Risk: A door that is not securely latched could open while the vehicle is in motion, increasing the risk of injury to a vehicle occupant.
Risk: An overheated cord can increase the risk of a fire.
Risk: Improperly welded apron joints may reduce the front-end structural integrity of the vehicle, increasing the risk of injury in the event of a crash.
Risk: A door that is not securely latched could open while the vehicle is in motion, increasing the risk of injury to a vehicle occupant.
Risk: If the engine does not turn off as expected, someone could move the transmission shifter out of park and the vehicle may move unintentionally, increasing the risk of a crash.
Risk: The short circuits could cause the frontal air bags, side curtain air bags and the seat belt pretensioners to not function as intended when needed, increasing the risk of occupant injury in the event of a crash.
Risk: The incorrectly manufactured steering gears may cause impaired steering, including the loss of steering control, increasing the risk of a crash.
Risk: If the side-curtain rollover air bag is delayed in deploying in certain rollover circumstances, the risk of injury to the passengers is increased.
Risk: The back of the subject seats may become loose or lean while driving and potentially increase the risk of injury in certain crashes.
Risk: Without an audible door chime, a vehicle owner may open the door and exit the vehicle without being reminded that the vehicle is still operational, leaving the vehicle susceptible to theft.
Other Ford models
Source: U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Office of Defects Investigation public data. Complaints are submitted by owners and are not verified by NHTSA or by us; a complaint does not prove a defect exists. Methodology